, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 20:43:01 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
The only way to get tear-free screen updates on snb is with pageflips,
which requires a opengl compositor
Thanks. What do you mean with opengl compositor? Isn't the Gnome3
desktop providing
Hi,
the tearing video issue with XV output seemed to be fixed on my old
computer with i945 graphics at some point. Last year I upgraded to a
box with i5-2400, and got bitten again by tearing video. Currently I
use kernel 3.4-rc5, Xserver 1.12 and xorg-intel 2.18. I use gnome3 and
gnome-shell on
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 20:43:01 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
The only way to get tear-free screen updates on snb is with pageflips,
which requires a opengl compositor
Thanks. What do you mean with opengl compositor? Isn't the Gnome3
desktop providing this?
Regards,
Tino
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 21:46:37 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:34:28PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 20:43:01 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[...]
The only way to get tear-free screen updates on snb is with pageflips,
which requires
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 16:32:47 -0400, Chun-Yu Shei wrote:
On 05/03/2012 03:51 PM, tino.keitel+x...@tikei.de wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 21:46:37 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:34:28PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 20:43:01 +0200, Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 16:54:18 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:59:04 +0100, Kai Krakow hurikha...@gmail.com wrote:
North Bridge Configuration:
VT-d
This doesn't exist
That's odd. I don't understand all of the SNB CPU variations; perhaps
there's a desktop
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 16:54:18 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:59:04 +0100, Kai Krakow hurikha...@gmail.com wrote:
North Bridge Configuration:
VT-d
This doesn't exist
That's odd. I don't understand all of the SNB CPU variations; perhaps
there's a desktop
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:54:15 +0100, tino.keitel+x...@tikei.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 20:57:51 +0100, tino.keitel+x...@tikei.de wrote:
[...]
it looks I stumbled over the same:
[88399.844150] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1952!
2011-12-14_19:28:56.93083
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:47:33 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:16, Rocko Requin rockoreq...@hotmail.com wrote:
If you can wire up netconsole you should be able to gather the full
backtrace and that would be really useful. Otherwise can you please
confirm by
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 08:16:35 +0100, tino.keitel+x...@tikei.de wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:27:29 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
This is the second release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
2.17.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from
Hi,
this does not
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:27:29 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
This is the second release candidate in preparation for the upcoming
2.17.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from
Hi,
this does not show up in
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel yet.
Is
Hi,
I upgraded from a computer with i945 to a Sandy Bridge box with a
i5-2400 CPU. Whereas the video tearing issue with XV output seemed to
be solved with the i945 graphics, I now have heavy tearing again. I
tried both mplayer -vo xv and mplayer -vo vaapi.
I also upgraded to Mesa 7.11, Xserver
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:39:53 +0800, Jin, Gordon wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to announce Intel 2011Q3 graphics package (note there's no
2011Q2 release), with bug fixes as usual, and Alpha support for Ivy
Bridge (Intel 2012 platforms).
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:16:58 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
We've been having some minor startup issues getting a 3 monitor
multi-head setup running where two digital monitors are driven by an
NVidia adapter and the 3rd analog monitor is driven by the VGA output
on a Z68/Sandy Bridge
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 14:08:24 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:54:11 +, Colin Guthrie in...@colin.guthr.ie
wrote:
Hi,
Running latest drivers from git + recent drm+xserver.
After upgrading to 2.6.38 I seem to get occasional graphical corruption.
This
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 17:59:20 -0600, John Harrigan wrote:
I have a Lenovo X201 laptop with an i7-620M processor. After I resume
from a Suspend to RAM the graphics are very slow. Suspend to Disk does
not cause the same problem and doing a Suspend to Disk after a Suspend
to RAM fixes the
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 18:16:44 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Hi Tino,
This looks like the rather newly introduced glyph corruption problem:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34980
Unfortunately no cure known, yet.
Thanks. I don't know if this is connected, but I enabled
Hi,
I noticed occasional graphics corruption in Xfce terminals. A
screenshot is attached.
This happens with kernel 2.6.38-rc (at least rc6 to rc8), Xserver
1.9.4, libdrm 2.4.23, xorg-intel 2.14 (the versions from Debian Sid
except for the kernel).
The hardware is a Mac mini Core2 Duo using
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:19:42 +0100, Oliver Seitz wrote:
On 13.02.2011 11:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:50:07 +0100, Oliver Seitz wrote:
Hi.
I can not make intelfb run on intel board D945GSEJT. I've tried a
very clean setup, here's what I've done:
Why would
Hi,
I see character corruption in X with 2.6.37, libdrm 2.4.21 and 2.4.23,
intel-xorg 2.13 and Xserver 1.7.7 (Debian Sid). In the kernel, I see
such log entries:
[drm:i915_gem_object_unbind] *ERROR* Attempting to unbind pinned buffer
Xorg.0.log looks like this:
(WW) intel(0):
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:30:23 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
[...]
This batch of fixes include the timing fixes for the fallout from the
conversion of intel_wait_for_vblank() and the error checking for SDVO
modesetting. It also includes a [double dose] of module unload oopsen
Thanks, this
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 15:19:20 +0200, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
TV1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
0mm x 0mm
848x48030.0 +
640x48030.0 +
1024x768 30.0*
800x60030.0
This is a Mac mini Core 2 Duo with Intel
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:30:39 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
Hi,
booting 2.6.36-rc2-git4 (commit
d4348c678977c7093438bbbf2067c49396ae941b) results in a screen
resolution of 1024x768 instead of 1680x1050. It works fine with
2.6.35.2.
The framebuffer console uses the correct resolution
Hi,
booting 2.6.36-rc2-git4 (commit
d4348c678977c7093438bbbf2067c49396ae941b) results in a screen
resolution of 1024x768 instead of 1680x1050. It works fine with
2.6.35.2.
The framebuffer console uses the correct resolution, but only uses a
part of the screen for text output. Xorg output looks
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:29:02 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote:
Hi,
it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system.
q3demo benchmark (run with ` to
Hi folks,
I discovered that windows wider than 2048 pixels contain only garbage
when using version 2.11.
I switched back to 2.9.1 and this doesn't happen. I use X server 1.7.6
from Debian Sid, kernel 2.6.33.2, libdrm 2.4.18 on a Mac mini Core 2
Duo with i945 graphics.
Regards,
Tino
26 matches
Mail list logo
