On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:08 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-06-15 12:08:23)
>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani
Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-06-15 12:08:23)
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, 12 Jun
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On 12/06/2018
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >> > On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> >> Semi-RFC. Do we want to
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> > On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that
>> >> shouldn't
>> >>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:15 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that
> >> shouldn't
> >> conflict much with in-flight patches.
> >>
> >> The trouble
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:19:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that shouldn't
> conflict much with in-flight patches.
>
> The trouble with mixed use is that it's inconsistent, and any remaining C99
> types will encourage their use. We
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that shouldn't
>> conflict much with in-flight patches.
>>
>> The trouble with mixed use is that it's inconsistent, and any remaining C99
>>
On 12/06/2018 10:19, Jani Nikula wrote:
Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that shouldn't
conflict much with in-flight patches.
The trouble with mixed use is that it's inconsistent, and any remaining C99
types will encourage their use. We could at least do the low
Semi-RFC. Do we want to do this? Here's a batch of conversions that shouldn't
conflict much with in-flight patches.
The trouble with mixed use is that it's inconsistent, and any remaining C99
types will encourage their use. We could at least do the low hanging fruit?
$ git grep
11 matches
Mail list logo