Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle

2014-07-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:01:35PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote: -Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:53 AM To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle

2014-07-03 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:24:15PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com This is an Execlists preparatory patch, since they make context ID become an overloaded term: - In the software, it was used to distinguish which context userspace was trying

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle

2014-07-03 Thread Mateo Lozano, Oscar
-Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:53 AM To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:30:52AM

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle

2014-07-01 Thread Mateo Lozano, Oscar
-Original Message- From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:54 PM To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:24:15 +0100

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle

2014-07-01 Thread Jesse Barnes
] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:24:15 +0100 oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com This is an Execlists preparatory patch, since they make context ID become an overloaded term: - In the software

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx-id to ctx-handle

2014-06-30 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:24:15 +0100 oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com This is an Execlists preparatory patch, since they make context ID become an overloaded term: - In the software, it was used to distinguish which context userspace was trying to use.