On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:17:11AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 16/02/2017 10:47, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:38:08AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>If the timer expires for enabling the fake interrupt, check to see
On 16/02/2017 10:47, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:38:08AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote:
If the timer expires for enabling the fake interrupt, check to see
if there is a real interrupt queued before making the decision to start
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:38:08AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >If the timer expires for enabling the fake interrupt, check to see
> >if there is a real interrupt queued before making the decision to start
> >polling. This helps in situations where
On 16/02/2017 09:29, Chris Wilson wrote:
If the timer expires for enabling the fake interrupt, check to see
if there is a real interrupt queued before making the decision to start
polling. This helps in situations where we have a very slow irq-seqno
barrier that may accrue more breadcrumb
