Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFC drm/i915: Add a sunset clause to GPU hang logging

2016-10-17 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ma, 2016-10-17 at 16:10 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:33:43PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Maybe we could even explicitly state that bugs should be reported to > > the distro bugzilla because of running an old kernel? > > Distro's already shut down our warnings

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFC drm/i915: Add a sunset clause to GPU hang logging

2016-10-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:33:43PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On pe, 2016-10-14 at 14:44 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > If the kernel is old, more than a few releases old, chances are that the > > user is using an old kernel for a good reason, despite there being GPU > > hangs. After 180days

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFC drm/i915: Add a sunset clause to GPU hang logging

2016-10-17 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On pe, 2016-10-14 at 14:44 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > If the kernel is old, more than a few releases old, chances are that the > user is using an old kernel for a good reason, despite there being GPU > hangs. After 180days since driver release stop suggesting that they > should send those

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFC drm/i915: Add a sunset clause to GPU hang logging

2016-10-14 Thread Chris Wilson
If the kernel is old, more than a few releases old, chances are that the user is using an old kernel for a good reason, despite there being GPU hangs. After 180days since driver release stop suggesting that they should send those reports upstream. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson