Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: use a separate context for gpu relocs"

2019-12-04 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-12-03 22:19:07) > > > On 11/29/19 4:48 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Since commit c45e788d95b4 ("drm/i915/tgl: Suspend pre-parser across GTT > > invalidations"), we now disable the advanced preparser on Tigerlake for the > > invalidation phase at the start of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: use a separate context for gpu relocs"

2019-12-03 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 11/29/19 4:48 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: Since commit c45e788d95b4 ("drm/i915/tgl: Suspend pre-parser across GTT invalidations"), we now disable the advanced preparser on Tigerlake for the invalidation phase at the start of the batch, we no longer need to emit the GPU relocations from a second

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: use a separate context for gpu relocs"

2019-11-29 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > Since commit c45e788d95b4 ("drm/i915/tgl: Suspend pre-parser across GTT > invalidations"), we now disable the advanced preparser on Tigerlake for the > invalidation phase at the start of the batch, we no longer need to emit > the GPU relocations from a second context as

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: use a separate context for gpu relocs"

2019-11-29 Thread Chris Wilson
Since commit c45e788d95b4 ("drm/i915/tgl: Suspend pre-parser across GTT invalidations"), we now disable the advanced preparser on Tigerlake for the invalidation phase at the start of the batch, we no longer need to emit the GPU relocations from a second context as they are now flushed inlined.