> It sucks, but I guess this is better than dead machines. I'd say let's
> wait another 1-2 weeks for tested-bys to trickle in, and if it does fix
> the problem then let's apply it. rps keeps on sucking, that's
> unfortunately not news at all.
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Certain Baytrails, namely the 4 cpu core variants, have been
> plaqued by spurious system hangs, mostly occurring with light loads.
>
> Multiple bisects by various people point to a commit which changes the
> reclocking strategy for
Chris Wilson writes:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:09:04PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> Chris Wilson writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> >> Certain Baytrails, namely the 4 cpu core variants, have
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:09:04PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> >> Certain Baytrails, namely the 4 cpu core variants, have been
> >> plaqued by spurious system hangs, mostly
Chris Wilson writes:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> Certain Baytrails, namely the 4 cpu core variants, have been
>> plaqued by spurious system hangs, mostly occurring with light loads.
>>
>> Multiple bisects by various people point
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:31:08PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Certain Baytrails, namely the 4 cpu core variants, have been
> plaqued by spurious system hangs, mostly occurring with light loads.
>
> Multiple bisects by various people point to a commit which changes the
> reclocking strategy for
Certain Baytrails, namely the 4 cpu core variants, have been
plaqued by spurious system hangs, mostly occurring with light loads.
Multiple bisects by various people point to a commit which changes the
reclocking strategy for Baytrail to follow its bigger brethen:
commit 8fb55197e64d ("drm/i915: