-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:12:25PM +, Runyan, Arthur J wrote:
I'll check it out. I haven't heard any complaint about this before, but
it may be one of those things that started
02, 2014 5:27 PM
To: Runyan, Arthur J; Daniel Vetter
Cc: Jani Nikula; Ville Syrjälä; Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
On 08/27/2014 01:54 PM, Runyan, Arthur J wrote:
:-) We pulled most of the mobile
Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:52 AM
To: Runyan, Arthur J
Cc: Jani Nikula; Taylor, Clinton A; Ville Syrjälä;
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:12:25PM +, Runyan, Arthur J
: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
+Art
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
There is also a need to add this delay when turning off the PWM enable
bit through
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:23:43AM -0700, Clint Taylor wrote:
On 08/20/2014 04:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:35PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
From: Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
+Art
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
There is also a need to add this delay when turning off the PWM enable
bit through intel_panel_disable_backlight(). If the PWM enable bit is
turned off while the PWM signal is high then the signal remains high. If
A; Ville Syrjälä; Runyan, Arthur J
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
+Art
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
There is also a need to add this delay when turning off
On 08/20/2014 04:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:35PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
From: Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:35PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
From: Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from VDD enable which occur several seconds
From: Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from VDD enable which occur several seconds before resulting
in PWM starting 5ms after backlight enable. Changes to backlight
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
From: Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from VDD enable which occur several seconds before resulting
in PWM
From: Clint Taylor clinton.a.tay...@intel.com
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from VDD enable which occur several seconds before resulting
in PWM starting 5ms after backlight enable. Changes to backlight
12 matches
Mail list logo