On 2/29/2016 2:35 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
Hi Jani and Daniel,
I believe I forgot to cc:stable on this one and this is missing on
most branches out there including Linus 4.5-r5.
Is there any chance to get this patch in for 4.5?
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Michel Thierry wrote:
> [ text/plain ]
> On 2/29/2016 2:35 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>>> Hi Jani and Daniel,
>>>
>>> I believe I forgot to cc:stable on this one and this is missing on
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:15:37PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Michel Thierry wrote:
> > [ text/plain ]
> > On 2/29/2016 2:35 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >>> Hi Jani and Daniel,
>
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Hi Jani and Daniel,
>
> I believe I forgot to cc:stable on this one and this is missing on
> most branches out there including Linus 4.5-r5.
> Is there any chance to get this patch in for 4.5? without this i915 is
> not working on
Hi Jani and Daniel,
I believe I forgot to cc:stable on this one and this is missing on
most branches out there including Linus 4.5-r5.
Is there any chance to get this patch in for 4.5? without this i915 is
not working on KBL.
Good thing is that this platform is still protected by
When adding IS_KABYLAKE definition I didn't included the
DC states related because I was planing to include them
with the patch that fixes DMC firmware loading, but I
forgot them.
Meanwhile this runtime pm code changed a lot for
Skylake.
Well, I didn't expect that this would crash the machine