On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 09:30 -0500, Balasubrawmanian, Vivaik wrote:
> On 6/1/2023 12:45 PM, Alan Previn wrote:
> > After recent discussions with Mesa folks, it was requested
> > that we optimize i915's GET_PARAM for the PXP_STATUS without
> > changing the UAPI spec.
> >
> > This patch adds this
On 6/1/2023 12:45 PM, Alan Previn wrote:
After recent discussions with Mesa folks, it was requested
that we optimize i915's GET_PARAM for the PXP_STATUS without
changing the UAPI spec.
This patch adds this additional optimizations:
- If any PXP initializatoin flow failed, then ensure that
Thanks Jani - will rev this up and fix these.
On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 16:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2023, Alan Previn wrote:
> > After recent discussions with Mesa folks, it was requested
> > that we optimize i915's GET_PARAM for the PXP_STATUS without
> > changing the UAPI
On Thu, 01 Jun 2023, Alan Previn wrote:
> After recent discussions with Mesa folks, it was requested
> that we optimize i915's GET_PARAM for the PXP_STATUS without
> changing the UAPI spec.
>
> This patch adds this additional optimizations:
Nitpick, please avoid "This patch". It's redundant, and
After recent discussions with Mesa folks, it was requested
that we optimize i915's GET_PARAM for the PXP_STATUS without
changing the UAPI spec.
This patch adds this additional optimizations:
- If any PXP initializatoin flow failed, then ensure that
we catch it so that we can change the
