On 9/16/19 1:54 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-09-16 21:37:26)
On 9/14/19 1:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Before we execute a batch, we must first issue any and all TLB
invalidations so that batch picks up the new page table entries.
Tigerlake's preparser is weake
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-09-16 21:37:26)
>
>
> On 9/14/19 1:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Before we execute a batch, we must first issue any and all TLB
> > invalidations so that batch picks up the new page table entries.
> > Tigerlake's preparser is weakening our post-sync CS_STALL
On 9/14/19 1:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Before we execute a batch, we must first issue any and all TLB
invalidations so that batch picks up the new page table entries.
Tigerlake's preparser is weakening our post-sync CS_STALL inside the
invalidate pipe-control and allowing the loading of the ba
Before we execute a batch, we must first issue any and all TLB
invalidations so that batch picks up the new page table entries.
Tigerlake's preparser is weakening our post-sync CS_STALL inside the
invalidate pipe-control and allowing the loading of the batch buffer
before we have setup its page tab
