On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:19:00PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Thinking about this some more we already cancel the rps work items
(with the exception of the vlv_work) in intel_disable_gt_powersave,
which is called already from i915_save_state. So I think we just need
to add the cancel_work for
Upon resume we will do a complete restoration of the mode and so reset
all tasks, but during suspend (and unload) we need to make sure that no
workers run concurrently with our suspend code. Or worse just after.
The issue was first raised whilst tackling a suspend issue with Takashi
Iwai
At Tue, 6 Aug 2013 13:24:02 +0100,
Chris Wilson wrote:
Upon resume we will do a complete restoration of the mode and so reset
all tasks, but during suspend (and unload) we need to make sure that no
workers run concurrently with our suspend code. Or worse just after.
The issue was first
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:24:02PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
Upon resume we will do a complete restoration of the mode and so reset
all tasks, but during suspend (and unload) we need to make sure that no
workers run concurrently with our suspend code. Or worse just after.
The issue was
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:24:02PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
Upon resume we will do a complete restoration of the mode and so reset
all tasks, but during suspend (and unload) we need to make sure that no
workers run
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:24:02PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
Upon resume we will do a complete restoration of the mode and so reset
all tasks, but
