Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't pretend ips is always enabled on BDW.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:17:00PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: 2014-06-30 8:45 GMT-03:00 Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com: As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading. However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always on and getting people confused about it. So this patch allows people to know if ips was ever attempted to be enabled. Even if the current status is impossible to be ascertain. v2: (spotted by Paulo): * A version that at least compiles * with more clear messages * let Cheryview on the safe side until we aren't sure that checking ips state on ips won't disable it. Cc: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't pretend ips is always enabled on BDW.
As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading. However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always on and getting people confused about it. So this patch allows people to know if ips was ever attempted to be enabled. Even if the current status is impossible to be ascertain. v2: (spotted by Paulo): * A version that at least compiles * with more clear messages * let Cheryview on the safe side until we aren't sure that checking ips state on ips won't disable it. Cc: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index a93b3bf..380be89 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1523,10 +1523,17 @@ static int i915_ips_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) || I915_READ(IPS_CTL) IPS_ENABLE) - seq_puts(m, enabled\n); - else - seq_puts(m, disabled\n); + seq_printf(m, Enabled by kernel parameter: %s\n, + yesno(i915.enable_ips)); + + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)-gen = 8) { + seq_puts(m, Currently: unknown\n); + } else { + if (I915_READ(IPS_CTL) IPS_ENABLE) + seq_puts(m, Currently: enabled\n); + else + seq_puts(m, Currently: disabled\n); + } intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); -- 1.9.3 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't pretend ips is always enabled on BDW.
2014-06-30 8:45 GMT-03:00 Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com: As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading. However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always on and getting people confused about it. So this patch allows people to know if ips was ever attempted to be enabled. Even if the current status is impossible to be ascertain. v2: (spotted by Paulo): * A version that at least compiles * with more clear messages * let Cheryview on the safe side until we aren't sure that checking ips state on ips won't disable it. Cc: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index a93b3bf..380be89 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1523,10 +1523,17 @@ static int i915_ips_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) || I915_READ(IPS_CTL) IPS_ENABLE) - seq_puts(m, enabled\n); - else - seq_puts(m, disabled\n); + seq_printf(m, Enabled by kernel parameter: %s\n, + yesno(i915.enable_ips)); + + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)-gen = 8) { + seq_puts(m, Currently: unknown\n); + } else { + if (I915_READ(IPS_CTL) IPS_ENABLE) + seq_puts(m, Currently: enabled\n); + else + seq_puts(m, Currently: disabled\n); + } intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); -- 1.9.3 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't pretend ips is always enabled on BDW.
As pointed out before we don't have a reliable way to read back ips status on BDW without the risk to disable it when reading. However now we are pretending that IPS on BDW is always on and getting people confused about it. So this patch allows people to know if ips was ever attempted to be enabled. Even if the current status is impossible to be ascertain. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index a93b3bf..5e36b3c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1523,10 +1523,16 @@ static int i915_ips_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) || I915_READ(IPS_CTL) IPS_ENABLE) - seq_puts(m, enabled\n); - else - seq_puts(m, disabled\n); + seq_puts(m, Enabled on boot: %s\n, yesno(i915.ips_enabled)); + + if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) { + seq_puts(m, Currently: impossible to ascertain\n); + } else { + if (I915_READ(IPS_CTL) IPS_ENABLE) + seq_puts(m, Currently: enabled\n); + else + seq_puts(m, Currently: disabled\n); + } intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); -- 1.9.3 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx