Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't touch fence->error when resetting an innocent request

2017-07-20 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-07-20 14:24:29) > If the request has been completed before the reset took effect, we don't > need to mark it up as being a victim. Touching fence->error after the > fence has been signaled is detected by dma_fence_set_error() and > triggers a BUG: > > [ 231.743133]

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't touch fence->error when resetting an innocent request

2017-07-20 Thread Chris Wilson
If the request has been completed before the reset took effect, we don't need to mark it up as being a victim. Touching fence->error after the fence has been signaled is detected by dma_fence_set_error() and triggers a BUG: [ 231.743133] kernel BUG at ./include/linux/dma-fence.h:434! [