Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:07:47PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: >> Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. >> Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other >> interrupts. >> v2: Make few

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:40:18AM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: On 7/7/2015 6:51 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:22:20PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. v2: Make few variables local to if block (Ville) v3: Add check for ibx/cpt both (Ville). While at it, remove the redundant check for hotplug_trigger from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 6740 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied ILK

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:07:47PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. v2: Make few variables local to if block (Ville) v3: Add check for ibx/cpt both (Ville).

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. v2: Make few variables local to if block (Ville) v3: Add check for ibx/cpt both (Ville). While at it, remove the redundant check for hotplug_trigger from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:22:20PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. v2: Make few variables local to if block (Ville) v3: Add check for ibx/cpt both (Ville).

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

On 7/7/2015 6:51 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 02:22:20PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote: Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. v2: Make few variables local to if block

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required. Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other interrupts. v2: Make few variables local to if block (Ville) Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal sonika.jin...@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 14

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 6724 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied ILK