Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kill the active list spinlock

2010-08-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:41:02 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:09:45 +0100, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not > > be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now > > should be able rely on hangc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kill the active list spinlock

2010-08-06 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:09:45 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not > be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now > should be able rely on hangcheck to do the job for us (and that error > reporting should not i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kill the active list spinlock

2010-08-04 Thread Chris Wilson
This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now should be able rely on hangcheck to do the job for us (and that error reporting should not itself require the struct mutex) we can kill the incomplete and mis