On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:41:02 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:09:45 +0100, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not
> > be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now
> > should be able rely on hangc
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:09:45 +0100, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not
> be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now
> should be able rely on hangcheck to do the job for us (and that error
> reporting should not i
This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not
be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now
should be able rely on hangcheck to do the job for us (and that error
reporting should not itself require the struct mutex) we can kill the
incomplete and mis