I was confused shortly whether the compat was needed for the int,
until I noticed the pointer in the original.
Also remove typedef.
v2: Review from Chris.
- Add comments.
- Also change the int param in the original structure.
Cc: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:07:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
I was confused shortly whether the compat was needed for the int,
until I noticed the pointer in the original.
Also remove typedef.
v2: Review from Chris.
- Add comments.
- Also change the int param in the original structure.