Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer-ring should be signed

2012-02-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:16:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:03:29AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things. Sorry, I should have said that it's not a gcc warning, it's a smatch thing. But also it's not uber-anal.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer-ring should be signed

2012-02-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer-ring should be signed

2012-02-16 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Daniel Vetter: gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things. which was introduced by the following commit. 96154f2faba5: drm/i915: switch ring-id to be a real id Reported-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com The URL