On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When waiting for a single fence beneath a syncobj, forgo our open coding
> for waiting over multiple fences and call the driver specific
> dma_fence_wait_timeout(). This gives the opportunity for the driver to
> handle it more
When waiting for a single fence beneath a syncobj, forgo our open coding
for waiting over multiple fences and call the driver specific
dma_fence_wait_timeout(). This gives the opportunity for the driver to
handle it more efficiently then the lcd of signal callbacks, and avoids
the temporary