Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/syncobj: Use dma_fence_wait for the simple wait case

2018-05-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > When waiting for a single fence beneath a syncobj, forgo our open coding > for waiting over multiple fences and call the driver specific > dma_fence_wait_timeout(). This gives the opportunity for the driver to > handle it more

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/syncobj: Use dma_fence_wait for the simple wait case

2018-05-05 Thread Chris Wilson
When waiting for a single fence beneath a syncobj, forgo our open coding for waiting over multiple fences and call the driver specific dma_fence_wait_timeout(). This gives the opportunity for the driver to handle it more efficiently then the lcd of signal callbacks, and avoids the temporary