On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:17:12AM -0400, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the explanation.
>
> I noticed that I forgot to add my r-b.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira
Uh I just pushed, so can't add your r-b now :-/
Sry.
-Daniel
>
> On 09/03, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep
Hi, thanks for the explanation.
I noticed that I forgot to add my r-b.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira
On 09/03, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 08:47:03AM -0400, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > All the series look really good for me. I just have some few questions
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 08:47:03AM -0400, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> All the series look really good for me. I just have some few questions
> here.
>
> On 07/23, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
> > not explain some of
Hi Daniel,
All the series look really good for me. I just have some few questions
here.
On 07/23, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
> not explain some of the missed vblank hilarity we've been seeing. I
I have to admit that I'm a little
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
> not explain some of the missed vblank hilarity we've been seeing. I
> think those all go through the vblank completion event, which has
> unconditional barriers
Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
not explain some of the missed vblank hilarity we've been seeing. I
think those all go through the vblank completion event, which has
unconditional barriers - it always takes the spinlock. Therefore no
cc stable.
v2:
-
