On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:46:31 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Have you verified no userspace relies on this return value? since this
> technically an ABI change.
>
> >From what I can see probably only libdrm tests care.
I haven't found any other instances of code checking return values, more
often th
This is consistent with trying to access a filename that not exist
within a directory which is a good analogy here. The main reason for the
change is that it is easy to confuse the error code of EBADF as an
performing an ioctl on an invalid file descriptor (rather than an
unknown object).
Signed-o
