Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: fix sparse warnings on undeclared symbols in crc debugfs

2016-10-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Chris Wilson  wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:28:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Fixes sparse warnings:
>> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:118:30: warning: symbol
>> 'drm_crtc_crc_control_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:264:30: warning: symbol
>> 'drm_crtc_crc_data_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:281:5: warning: symbol
>> 'drm_debugfs_crtc_crc_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> 
>> Fixes: 9edbf1fa600a ("drm: Add API for capturing frame CRCs")
>> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard 
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter 
>> Cc: Emil Velikov 
>> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson 

Pushed to drm-misc, thanks for the review.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: fix sparse warnings on undeclared symbols in crc debugfs

2016-10-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:28:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Fixes sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:118:30: warning: symbol
> 'drm_crtc_crc_control_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:264:30: warning: symbol
> 'drm_crtc_crc_data_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:281:5: warning: symbol
> 'drm_debugfs_crtc_crc_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Fixes: 9edbf1fa600a ("drm: Add API for capturing frame CRCs")
> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard 
> Cc: Daniel Vetter 
> Cc: Emil Velikov 
> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula 
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson 
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: fix sparse warnings on undeclared symbols in crc debugfs

2016-10-18 Thread Jani Nikula
Fixes sparse warnings:

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:118:30: warning: symbol
'drm_crtc_crc_control_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:264:30: warning: symbol
'drm_crtc_crc_data_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c:281:5: warning: symbol
'drm_debugfs_crtc_crc_add' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: 9edbf1fa600a ("drm: Add API for capturing frame CRCs")
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard 
Cc: Daniel Vetter 
Cc: Emil Velikov 
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso 
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
index 4129405d17c0..00e771fb7df2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include "drm_internal.h"
 
 /**
  * DOC: CRC ABI
@@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ static ssize_t crc_control_write(struct file *file, const 
char __user *ubuf,
return len;
 }
 
-const struct file_operations drm_crtc_crc_control_fops = {
+static const struct file_operations drm_crtc_crc_control_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = crc_control_open,
.read = seq_read,
@@ -261,7 +262,7 @@ static ssize_t crtc_crc_read(struct file *filep, char 
__user *user_buf,
return LINE_LEN(crc->values_cnt);
 }
 
-const struct file_operations drm_crtc_crc_data_fops = {
+static const struct file_operations drm_crtc_crc_data_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = crtc_crc_open,
.read = crtc_crc_read,
-- 
2.1.4

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx