Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:17:09AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote: On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 09:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote: On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-10 Thread Ankitprasad Sharma
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 09:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote: On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote: On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory placement of the GEM object can be

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-07 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:52:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-07 Thread Ankitprasad Sharma
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:12:08AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:52:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-05-06 Thread ankitprasad . r . sharma
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory placement of the GEM object can be specified, i.e. either shmem or stolen memory. These testcases include functional tests

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-04-29 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:02:20PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory placement of the GEM object can be

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-04-29 Thread ankitprasad . r . sharma
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory placement of the GEM object can be specified, i.e. either shmem or stolen memory. These testcases include functional tests

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-04-11 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 05:58:12PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory placement of the GEM object can be

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/gem_create_stolen: Verifying extended gem_create ioctl

2015-04-11 Thread ankitprasad . r . sharma
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory placement of the GEM object can be specified, i.e. either shmem or stolen memory. These testcases include functional tests