On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:17:09AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 09:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 09:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:54:26AM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory
placement of the GEM object can be
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:52:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 08:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means of
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:12:08AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:52:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:52PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory
placement of the GEM object can be specified, i.e. either
shmem or stolen memory.
These testcases include functional tests
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:02:20PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory
placement of the GEM object can be
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory
placement of the GEM object can be specified, i.e. either
shmem or stolen memory.
These testcases include functional tests
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 05:58:12PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory
placement of the GEM object can be
From: Ankitprasad Sharma ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
This patch adds the testcases for verifying the new extended
gem_create ioctl. By means of this extended ioctl, memory
placement of the GEM object can be specified, i.e. either
shmem or stolen memory.
These testcases include functional tests
12 matches
Mail list logo