Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Future-proof ring names for aubinator_error_decode

2018-01-18 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-01-18 16:44:18) > On 1/17/2018 7:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > The kernel is moving to a $class$instance naming scheme in preparation > > for accommodating more rings in the future in a consistent manner. It is > > already using the naming scheme internally, and now

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Future-proof ring names for aubinator_error_decode

2018-01-18 Thread Michel Thierry
On 1/17/2018 7:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: The kernel is moving to a $class$instance naming scheme in preparation for accommodating more rings in the future in a consistent manner. It is already using the naming scheme internally, and now we are looking at updating some soft-ABI such as the error

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Future-proof ring names for aubinator_error_decode

2018-01-17 Thread Chris Wilson
The kernel is moving to a $class$instance naming scheme in preparation for accommodating more rings in the future in a consistent manner. It is already using the naming scheme internally, and now we are looking at updating some soft-ABI such as the error state to use the new naming scheme. This of