Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_evict_everything: Use bo_count instead of count where intended

On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:46 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:33:28PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_evict_everything: Use bo_count instead of count where intended

On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:33:28PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > > > > Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was intended > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_evict_everything: Use bo_count instead of count where intended

On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > > > Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was intended > > to use bo_count at these places. > > > > Also using count to determine nu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_evict_everything: Use bo_count instead of count where intended

On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:37:49AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was intended > to use bo_count at these places. > > Also using count to determine number of processes does not make > sense unless thousands of cores. >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_evict_everything: Use bo_count instead of count where intended

From: Tvrtko Ursulin Don't see that it causes a problem but it looks it was intended to use bo_count at these places. Also using count to determine number of processes does not make sense unless thousands of cores. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- tests/gem_evict_everything.c | 12 +-