On 12/01/16 at 04:00pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/30/16 at 03:25pm, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 11/24/16 at 10:53am, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > > I see a lot of
On 11/30/16 at 03:25pm, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 11/24/16 at 10:53am, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > I see a lot of below warning:
> > >
> > > No, we must not hide this
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:03:20PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/24/16 at 10:53am, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Dave Young wrote:
> > > I see a lot of below warning:
> >
> > No, we must not hide this under the carpet. There's a bug at fdo about
> > this, and
On 11/24/16 at 10:53am, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Dave Young wrote:
> > I see a lot of below warning:
>
> No, we must not hide this under the carpet. There's a bug at fdo about
> this, and we need to fix it.
It is not hiding it, just not repeating the
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Dave Young wrote:
> I see a lot of below warning:
No, we must not hide this under the carpet. There's a bug at fdo about
this, and we need to fix it.
BR,
Jani.
> [ 17.128256] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 95 at
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:1062
I see a lot of below warning:
[ 17.128256] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 95 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:1062
intel_dp_aux_transfer+0x201/0x240 [i915]
[ 17.128264] WARN_ON_ONCE(!msg->buffer != !msg->size)
[ 17.128267] Modules linked in:
[ 17.128273] kvm_intel kvm irqbypass i915 intel_gtt