Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Sun, 7 Jul 2013 19:59:33 -0400, Wang xingchao wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:20:59AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > >> >> > drm-intel-next. I'll show up in the next linux-next and I'll > > > >> >> > forward it to > > > >> >> > Dave for mergin into drm-next in roughly 2 weeks. > > > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-08 Thread Wang xingchao
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:20:59AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > >> >> > drm-intel-next. I'll show up in the next linux-next and I'll > > >> >> > forward it to > > >> >> > Dave for mergin into drm-next in roughly 2 weeks. > > >> >> > > >> >> So today I unblacklisted the audio modules on one of my

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-05 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:19:32 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > 2013/7/4 Wang xingchao : > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:24:15AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2013/7/4 Wang xingchao : > >> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:00:51PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> >> 2013/6/6 Daniel Vetter : > >> >> > On Thu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/7/4 Wang xingchao : > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:24:15AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2013/7/4 Wang xingchao : >> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:00:51PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> >> 2013/6/6 Daniel Vetter : >> >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM +0800, Wang Xingchao wrote: >> >> >> Hi a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-04 Thread Wang xingchao
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:24:15AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/7/4 Wang xingchao : > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:00:51PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2013/6/6 Daniel Vetter : > >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM +0800, Wang Xingchao wrote: > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >>This is V

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-04 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/7/4 Wang xingchao : > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:00:51PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2013/6/6 Daniel Vetter : >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM +0800, Wang Xingchao wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >>This is V7 and here're some changes notes: >> >>change from V6-->V7: >> >>- r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-04 Thread Wang xingchao
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:00:51PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/6/6 Daniel Vetter : > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM +0800, Wang Xingchao wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >>This is V7 and here're some changes notes: > >>change from V6-->V7: > >>- rename variable > >>- use HAS_P

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-07-03 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/6/6 Daniel Vetter : > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM +0800, Wang Xingchao wrote: >> Hi all, >> >>This is V7 and here're some changes notes: >>change from V6-->V7: >>- rename variable >>- use HAS_POWER_WELL instead of IS_HASWELL >>- put structure inside drm_i915_private

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-06-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:07:07PM +0800, Wang Xingchao wrote: > Hi all, > >This is V7 and here're some changes notes: >change from V6-->V7: >- rename variable >- use HAS_POWER_WELL instead of IS_HASWELL >- put structure inside drm_i915_private >- use WARN_ON for global poi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4 V7] Power-well API implementation for Haswell

2013-05-30 Thread Wang Xingchao
Hi all, This is V7 and here're some changes notes: change from V6-->V7: - rename variable - use HAS_POWER_WELL instead of IS_HASWELL - put structure inside drm_i915_private - use WARN_ON for global pointer check change from V5-->V6: - Remove duplication code in new introdu