On 10/07/2018 13:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-07-10 13:19:51)
On 09/07/2018 14:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
Our goal is to remove struct_mutex and replace it with fine grained
locking. One of the thorny issues is our eviction logic for reclaiming
space for an execbuffer
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-07-10 13:19:51)
>
> On 09/07/2018 14:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Our goal is to remove struct_mutex and replace it with fine grained
> > locking. One of the thorny issues is our eviction logic for reclaiming
> > space for an execbuffer (or GTT mmaping, among a few
On 09/07/2018 14:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
Our goal is to remove struct_mutex and replace it with fine grained
locking. One of the thorny issues is our eviction logic for reclaiming
space for an execbuffer (or GTT mmaping, among a few other examples).
While eviction itself is easy to move under a
Our goal is to remove struct_mutex and replace it with fine grained
locking. One of the thorny issues is our eviction logic for reclaiming
space for an execbuffer (or GTT mmaping, among a few other examples).
While eviction itself is easy to move under a per-VM mutex, performing
the activity
