[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: fix hpd interrupt register locking
Our interrupt handler (in hardird context) could race with the timer (in softirq context), hence we need to hold the spinlock around the call to -hdp_irq_setup in intel_hpd_irq_handler, too. But as an optimization (and more so to clarify things) we don't need to do the irqsave/restore dance in the hardirq context. Note also that on ilk+ the race isn't just against the hotplug reenable timer, but also against the fifo underrun reporting. That one also modifies the SDEIMR register (again protected by the same dev_priv-irq_lock). To lock things down again sprinkle a assert_spin_locked. But exclude the functions touching SDEIMR for now, I want to extract them all into a new helper function (like we do already for pipestate, display interrupts and all the various gt interrupts). Cc: Egbert Eich e...@suse.de Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 15 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 1815891..95e15cd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -880,15 +880,13 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev, const u32 *hpd) { drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev-dev_private; - unsigned long irqflags; int i; bool storm_detected = false; if (!hotplug_trigger) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); - + spin_lock(dev_priv-irq_lock); for (i = 1; i HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) { if (!(hpd[i] hotplug_trigger) || @@ -911,10 +909,9 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev, } } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); - if (storm_detected) dev_priv-display.hpd_irq_setup(dev); + spin_unlock(dev_priv-irq_lock); queue_work(dev_priv-wq, dev_priv-hotplug_work); @@ -3327,6 +3324,8 @@ static void i915_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_device *dev) struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder; u32 hotplug_en; + assert_spin_locked(dev_priv-irq_lock); + if (I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev)) { hotplug_en = I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_EN); hotplug_en = ~HOTPLUG_INT_EN_MASK; @@ -3610,6 +3609,7 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev) struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev-dev_private; struct drm_mode_config *mode_config = dev-mode_config; struct drm_connector *connector; + unsigned long irqflags; int i; for (i = 1; i HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) { @@ -3622,6 +3622,11 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev) if (!connector-polled I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev) intel_connector-encoder-hpd_pin HPD_NONE) connector-polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD; } + + /* Interrup setup is already guaranteed to be single-threaded, this is +* just to make the assert_spin_locked checks happy. */ + spin_lock_irqsave(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); if (dev_priv-display.hpd_irq_setup) dev_priv-display.hpd_irq_setup(dev); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); } -- 1.8.1.4 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: fix hpd interrupt register locking
Daniel Vetter writes: Our interrupt handler (in hardird context) could race with the timer Nitpick: s/d/q/ (in softirq context), hence we need to hold the spinlock around the call to -hdp_irq_setup in intel_hpd_irq_handler, too. But as an optimization (and more so to clarify things) we don't need to do the irqsave/restore dance in the hardirq context. Note also that on ilk+ the race isn't just against the hotplug reenable timer, but also against the fifo underrun reporting. That one also modifies the SDEIMR register (again protected by the same dev_priv-irq_lock). To lock things down again sprinkle a assert_spin_locked. But exclude the functions touching SDEIMR for now, I want to extract them all into a new helper function (like we do already for pipestate, display interrupts and all the various gt interrupts). Cc: Egbert Eich e...@suse.de Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 15 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 1815891..95e15cd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -880,15 +880,13 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev, const u32 *hpd) { drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev-dev_private; -unsigned long irqflags; int i; bool storm_detected = false; if (!hotplug_trigger) return; -spin_lock_irqsave(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); - +spin_lock(dev_priv-irq_lock); for (i = 1; i HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) { if (!(hpd[i] hotplug_trigger) || @@ -911,10 +909,9 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev, } } -spin_unlock_irqrestore(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); - if (storm_detected) dev_priv-display.hpd_irq_setup(dev); +spin_unlock(dev_priv-irq_lock); queue_work(dev_priv-wq, dev_priv-hotplug_work); @@ -3327,6 +3324,8 @@ static void i915_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_device *dev) struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder; u32 hotplug_en; +assert_spin_locked(dev_priv-irq_lock); + if (I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev)) { hotplug_en = I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_EN); hotplug_en = ~HOTPLUG_INT_EN_MASK; Didn't you want to do the same for ibx_hpd_irq_setup() ? @@ -3610,6 +3609,7 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev) struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev-dev_private; struct drm_mode_config *mode_config = dev-mode_config; struct drm_connector *connector; +unsigned long irqflags; int i; for (i = 1; i HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) { @@ -3622,6 +3622,11 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev) if (!connector-polled I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev) intel_connector-encoder-hpd_pin HPD_NONE) connector-polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD; } + +/* Interrup setup is already guaranteed to be single-threaded, this is Nitpick - missed a 't'. + * just to make the assert_spin_locked checks happy. */ +spin_lock_irqsave(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); if (dev_priv-display.hpd_irq_setup) dev_priv-display.hpd_irq_setup(dev); +spin_unlock_irqrestore(dev_priv-irq_lock, irqflags); } -- 1.8.1.4 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915: fix hpd interrupt register locking
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Egbert Eich e...@suse.com wrote: +assert_spin_locked(dev_priv-irq_lock); + if (I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev)) { hotplug_en = I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_EN); hotplug_en = ~HOTPLUG_INT_EN_MASK; Didn't you want to do the same for ibx_hpd_irq_setup() ? Will happen in a follow-up patch, since I first consolidate all access to SDEIMR into one single helper function. I've tried to explain that a bit in the commit message but failed to make the connection to ibx_hpd_irq_setup - once we have the helper function the assert_spin_locked is in there and so ibx_hpd_irq_setup doesn't need its own check (since it won't touch SDEIMR directly any more). -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx