Quoting Michał Winiarski (2018-02-27 15:37:04)
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:37:25PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:52:24 +0100, Michał Winiarski
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We only need those fast memcpy_wc when we're using relay to read
> > >
On 2/27/2018 6:22 PM, Michał Winiarski wrote:
We only need those fast memcpy_wc when we're using relay to read
continuous GuC log. Let's prevent the user from creating a relay if we
know we won't be able to keep up with GuC.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski
Cc:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:37:25PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:52:24 +0100, Michał Winiarski
> wrote:
>
> > We only need those fast memcpy_wc when we're using relay to read
> > continuous GuC log. Let's prevent the user from creating a
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:52:24 +0100, Michał Winiarski
wrote:
We only need those fast memcpy_wc when we're using relay to read
continuous GuC log. Let's prevent the user from creating a relay if we
know we won't be able to keep up with GuC.
Signed-off-by: Michał
We only need those fast memcpy_wc when we're using relay to read
continuous GuC log. Let's prevent the user from creating a relay if we
know we won't be able to keep up with GuC.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski
Cc: Chris Wilson
Cc: Daniele