Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: fix FBC frontbuffer tracking flushing code

2015-07-31 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2015-07-30 20:37 GMT-03:00 Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:30 PM Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com Due to the way busy_bits was handled, we were not doing any flushes if we didn't previously get an invalidate.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: fix FBC frontbuffer tracking flushing code

2015-07-30 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:30 PM Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com Due to the way busy_bits was handled, we were not doing any flushes if we didn't previously get an invalidate. Since it's possible to get flushes without an invalidate first,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: fix FBC frontbuffer tracking flushing code

2015-07-14 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com Due to the way busy_bits was handled, we were not doing any flushes if we didn't previously get an invalidate. Since it's possible to get flushes without an invalidate first, remove the busy_bits early return. So now that we don't have the busy_bits