Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/bdw: Always issue a force restore
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:20:00PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:15:13AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: From: Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com The PDPs seem to get screwed up otherwise, specifically PDP0. I am not really clear why this is required, it just works with full PPGTT. v2: Only do it for gen8, to limit regression potential v3: Fix the bugzilla links Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78935 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78936 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78937 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78938 Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com Hi Rodrigo. This patch was superseded by my [partially merged] series here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-July/048311.html In that series I went through very thoroughly with design why we need to do this, and verified those patches do address this issue. So yeah, NAK from me - and please get those reworked or merged or whatever. Iirc I've stopped merging on that series since it mixes up gen8 specific fixes with generic ppgtt fixes. Specifically for the ppgtt_release issues we now have a patch (plus fixups) which is almost ready (just stalling for review). Can you pls go through that series with Rodrigo so that he knows which parts are the gen8 fixes? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/bdw: Always issue a force restore
From: Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com The PDPs seem to get screwed up otherwise, specifically PDP0. I am not really clear why this is required, it just works with full PPGTT. v2: Only do it for gen8, to limit regression potential v3: Fix the bugzilla links Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78935 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78936 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78937 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78938 Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c index 3b99390..56f7b1e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c @@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ mi_set_context(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, else intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP); + if (INTEL_INFO(ring-dev)-gen == 8) + hw_flags |= MI_FORCE_RESTORE; + intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP); intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_SET_CONTEXT); intel_ring_emit(ring, i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(new_context-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state) | -- 1.9.3 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/bdw: Always issue a force restore
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:15:13AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: From: Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com The PDPs seem to get screwed up otherwise, specifically PDP0. I am not really clear why this is required, it just works with full PPGTT. v2: Only do it for gen8, to limit regression potential v3: Fix the bugzilla links Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78891 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78935 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78936 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78937 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78938 Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com Hi Rodrigo. This patch was superseded by my [partially merged] series here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-July/048311.html In that series I went through very thoroughly with design why we need to do this, and verified those patches do address this issue. So yeah, NAK from me - and please get those reworked or merged or whatever. Thanks [snip] -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
