Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-12-08 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Matthew, On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Matthew Auld wrote: Can you please add a version number to your patches? Having the same subject line five times is just annoying. > From: Joonas Lahtinen > To give upcoming SKU BIOSes more flexibility in placing the Intel >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-12-07 Thread Matthew Auld
From: Joonas Lahtinen To give upcoming SKU BIOSes more flexibility in placing the Intel graphics stolen memory, make all variables storing the placement or size compatible with full 64 bit range. Also by exporting the stolen region as a resource, we can then nuke

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-12-05 Thread Matthew Auld
From: Joonas Lahtinen To give upcoming SKU BIOSes more flexibility in placing the Intel graphics stolen memory, make all variables storing the placement or size compatible with full 64 bit range. Also by exporting the stolen region as a resource, we can then nuke

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-27 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 22:05 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-11-24 21:29:22) > > From: Joonas Lahtinen > > > > In preparation for upcoming SKUs, allow more freedom in placement > > of the Intel graphics stolen memory by BIOS to full 64bit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-27 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On Sat, 2017-11-25 at 00:48 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Matthew Auld wrote: > > > From: Joonas Lahtinen > > Please CC the linux kernel mailinglist on patches related to x86. The > MAINTAINERS file says: > > X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-24 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Matthew Auld wrote: > From: Joonas Lahtinen Please CC the linux kernel mailinglist on patches related to x86. The MAINTAINERS file says: X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT) M: Thomas Gleixner M: Ingo Molnar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-24 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-11-24 21:29:22) > From: Joonas Lahtinen > > In preparation for upcoming SKUs, allow more freedom in placement > of the Intel graphics stolen memory by BIOS to full 64bit range. > > v2: export the stolen region as a resource > fix

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit

2017-11-24 Thread Matthew Auld
From: Joonas Lahtinen In preparation for upcoming SKUs, allow more freedom in placement of the Intel graphics stolen memory by BIOS to full 64bit range. v2: export the stolen region as a resource fix u16 << 16 (Chris) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen