Em Qui, 2017-10-05 às 07:59 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 01:20:57PM +, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 00:06 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > When port clock is zero or undefined we base our
> > > calculation on cdclk. So, same function can be used
> > >
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 01:20:57PM +, Mika Kahola wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 00:06 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > When port clock is zero or undefined we base our
> > calculation on cdclk. So, same function can be used
> > for port clock == 0 now that we have the same default "2".
> >
> >
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 00:06 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> When port clock is zero or undefined we base our
> calculation on cdclk. So, same function can be used
> for port clock == 0 now that we have the same default "2".
>
> v2: s/get/new: When documenting "get" sounded ambiguous
> because we
When port clock is zero or undefined we base our
calculation on cdclk. So, same function can be used
for port clock == 0 now that we have the same default "2".
v2: s/get/new: When documenting "get" sounded ambiguous
because we could be getting the current level at pcode.
Cc: Mika Kahola
