Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Init important ns2501 registers

2014-09-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:22:03AM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > In my earlier rewrite I missed a few important registers. Thomas Richter > noticed that they're needed to make his machine resume correctly. > > Looks like IEGD does a one time init of these

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Init important ns2501 registers

2014-08-15 Thread Thomas Richter
On 15.08.2014 00:22, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Ville Syrjälä In my earlier rewrite I missed a few important registers. Thomas Richter noticed that they're needed to make his machine resume correctly. Looks like IEGD does a one time init of these three registers. We don't have

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Init important ns2501 registers

2014-08-15 Thread Thomas Richter
On 15.08.2014 00:22, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Ville Syrjälä In my earlier rewrite I missed a few important registers. Thomas Richter noticed that they're needed to make his machine resume correctly. Looks like IEGD does a one time init of these three registers. We don't have

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Init important ns2501 registers

2014-08-14 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä In my earlier rewrite I missed a few important registers. Thomas Richter noticed that they're needed to make his machine resume correctly. Looks like IEGD does a one time init of these three registers. We don't have a good one time init place in the ns2501 driver, so let's ju