Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dsi: start using enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format

2016-03-18 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:21:40PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > A small step moving us closer to DRM MIPI DSI code. Use enum > mipi_dsi_pixel_format instead of our own. The first benefit is being > able to use common mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(). > > There's a little back and forth conversion

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dsi: start using enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format

2016-03-16 Thread Jani Nikula
A small step moving us closer to DRM MIPI DSI code. Use enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format instead of our own. The first benefit is being able to use common mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(). There's a little back and forth conversion with the VBT -> enum -> register, since we have just shoved the VBT value

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dsi: start using enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format

2016-01-14 Thread Jani Nikula
A small step moving us closer to DRM MIPI DSI code. Use enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format instead of our own. The first benefit is being able to use common mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(). There's a little back and forth conversion with the VBT -> enum -> register, since we have just shoved the VBT value

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dsi: start using enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format

2016-01-14 Thread Mika Kahola
On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 12:28 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > A small step moving us closer to DRM MIPI DSI code. Use enum > mipi_dsi_pixel_format instead of our own. The first benefit is being > able to use common mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(). > > There's a little back and forth conversion with the