On 08/03/2023 05:36, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 03:10:24 -0800, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi Tvrtko,
On 04/03/2023 01:27, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
SLPC does not use 'struct intel_rps'. Use UNSLICE_RATIO bits from
Would it be more accurate to say 'SLPC does not use
On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 03:10:24 -0800, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
Hi Tvrtko,
> On 04/03/2023 01:27, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> > SLPC does not use 'struct intel_rps'. Use UNSLICE_RATIO bits from
>
> Would it be more accurate to say 'SLPC does not use rps->cur_freq' rather
> than it not using struct
On 04/03/2023 01:27, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
SLPC does not use 'struct intel_rps'. Use UNSLICE_RATIO bits from
Would it be more accurate to say 'SLPC does not use rps->cur_freq'
rather than it not using struct intel_rps?
Fixes: / stable ? CI chances of catching this?
GEN6_RPNSWREQ for
SLPC does not use 'struct intel_rps'. Use UNSLICE_RATIO bits from
GEN6_RPNSWREQ for SLPC. See intel_rps_get_requested_frequency.
Bspec: 52745
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
