Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr/cnl: Set y-coordinate as valid in SDP

2018-04-02 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:42:23AM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2018-03-31 at 00:17 +, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 16:46 -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 14:15 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > > This was my bad,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr/cnl: Set y-coordinate as valid in SDP

2018-04-02 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Sat, 2018-03-31 at 00:17 +, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 16:46 -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 14:15 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > This was my bad, spec says that the name of this bit is > > > 'Y-coordinate valid' but the values for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr/cnl: Set y-coordinate as valid in SDP

2018-03-30 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 16:46 -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 14:15 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > This was my bad, spec says that the name of this bit is > > 'Y-coordinate valid' but the values for it is: > > 0: Include Y-coordinate valid eDP1.4a > > 1: Do not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr/cnl: Set y-coordinate as valid in SDP

2018-03-30 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 14:15 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > This was my bad, spec says that the name of this bit is > 'Y-coordinate valid' but the values for it is: > 0: Include Y-coordinate valid eDP1.4a > 1: Do not include Y-coordinate valid eDP 1.4 > So renaming the bit and not setting

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr/cnl: Set y-coordinate as valid in SDP

2018-03-30 Thread José Roberto de Souza
This was my bad, spec says that the name of this bit is 'Y-coordinate valid' but the values for it is: 0: Include Y-coordinate valid eDP1.4a 1: Do not include Y-coordinate valid eDP 1.4 So renaming the bit and not setting it. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan Signed-off-by: