Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/uc: Move FW size sanity check back to fetch

2019-08-14 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio



On 8/14/19 4:38 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:

From: Michał Winiarski 

While we need to know WOPCM size to do this sanity check, it has more to
do with FW than with WOPCM. Let's move the check to fetch phase, it's
not like WOPCM is going to grow in the meantime.

v2: rebased

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski 
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko 
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 
Cc: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Jackie Li 
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen 
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 11 +++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c   | 14 ++
  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
index d056e1f4bd6d..98cb0eff143f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ int intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw, struct 
drm_i915_private *i915)
size_t size;
int err;
  
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915->wopcm.size);

GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_fw_supported(uc_fw));
  
  	err = i915_inject_load_error(i915, -ENXIO);

@@ -324,6 +325,16 @@ int intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw, struct 
drm_i915_private *i915)
goto fail;
}
  
+	/* Sanity check whether this fw is not larger than whole WOPCM memory */

+   size = sizeof(struct uc_css_header) + uc_fw->ucode_size;


We could add a __intel_uc_fw_get_upload_size() that skips the 
is_available() check and use that here. With our without this:


Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 

Daniele


+   if (unlikely(size >= i915->wopcm.size)) {
+   dev_warn(dev, "%s firmware %s: invalid size: %zu > %zu\n",
+intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type), uc_fw->path,
+size, (size_t)i915->wopcm.size);
+   err = -E2BIG;
+   goto fail;
+   }
+
/* Get version numbers from the CSS header */
switch (uc_fw->type) {
case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
index e5bc7b8a433e..295978356eef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
@@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);
GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.base);
GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.size);
+   GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
+   GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
  
  	if (i915_inject_probe_failure(i915))

return;
@@ -209,18 +211,6 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
goto check;
}
  
-	if (guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) {

-   DRM_ERROR("GuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.",
- guc_fw_size / 1024);
-   return;
-   }
-
-   if (huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) {
-   DRM_ERROR("HuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.",
- huc_fw_size / 1024);
-   return;
-   }
-
guc_wopcm_base = ALIGN(huc_fw_size + WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE,
   GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_ALIGNMENT);
if ((guc_wopcm_base + ctx_rsvd) >= wopcm->size) {


___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/uc: Move FW size sanity check back to fetch

2019-08-14 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
From: Michał Winiarski 

While we need to know WOPCM size to do this sanity check, it has more to
do with FW than with WOPCM. Let's move the check to fetch phase, it's
not like WOPCM is going to grow in the meantime.

v2: rebased

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski 
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko 
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 
Cc: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Jackie Li 
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 11 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c   | 14 ++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
index d056e1f4bd6d..98cb0eff143f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ int intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw, struct 
drm_i915_private *i915)
size_t size;
int err;
 
+   GEM_BUG_ON(!i915->wopcm.size);
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_fw_supported(uc_fw));
 
err = i915_inject_load_error(i915, -ENXIO);
@@ -324,6 +325,16 @@ int intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw, struct 
drm_i915_private *i915)
goto fail;
}
 
+   /* Sanity check whether this fw is not larger than whole WOPCM memory */
+   size = sizeof(struct uc_css_header) + uc_fw->ucode_size;
+   if (unlikely(size >= i915->wopcm.size)) {
+   dev_warn(dev, "%s firmware %s: invalid size: %zu > %zu\n",
+intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type), uc_fw->path,
+size, (size_t)i915->wopcm.size);
+   err = -E2BIG;
+   goto fail;
+   }
+
/* Get version numbers from the CSS header */
switch (uc_fw->type) {
case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
index e5bc7b8a433e..295978356eef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
@@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);
GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.base);
GEM_BUG_ON(wopcm->guc.size);
+   GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
+   GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size);
 
if (i915_inject_probe_failure(i915))
return;
@@ -209,18 +211,6 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
goto check;
}
 
-   if (guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) {
-   DRM_ERROR("GuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.",
- guc_fw_size / 1024);
-   return;
-   }
-
-   if (huc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) {
-   DRM_ERROR("HuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.",
- huc_fw_size / 1024);
-   return;
-   }
-
guc_wopcm_base = ALIGN(huc_fw_size + WOPCM_RESERVED_SIZE,
   GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_ALIGNMENT);
if ((guc_wopcm_base + ctx_rsvd) >= wopcm->size) {
-- 
2.19.2

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx