Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation support on all new hardware (v5)

2021-03-17 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:55 AM Petri Latvala wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29:20PM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: > > From: Jason Ekstrand > > > > The Vulkan driver in Mesa for Intel hardware never uses relocations if > > it's running on a version of i915 that supports at least softpin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation support on all new hardware (v5)

2021-03-17 Thread Petri Latvala
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29:20PM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: > From: Jason Ekstrand > > The Vulkan driver in Mesa for Intel hardware never uses relocations if > it's running on a version of i915 that supports at least softpin which > all versions of i915 supporting Gen12 do. On the OpenGL

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation support on all new hardware (v5)

2021-03-15 Thread Ashutosh Dixit
From: Jason Ekstrand The Vulkan driver in Mesa for Intel hardware never uses relocations if it's running on a version of i915 that supports at least softpin which all versions of i915 supporting Gen12 do. On the OpenGL side, Gen12+ is only supported by iris which never uses relocations. The

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation support on all new hardware (v5)

2021-03-15 Thread Jason Ekstrand
The Vulkan driver in Mesa for Intel hardware never uses relocations if it's running on a version of i915 that supports at least softpin which all versions of i915 supporting Gen12 do. On the OpenGL side, Gen12+ is only supported by iris which never uses relocations. The older i965 driver in Mesa