On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:53 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:36:01PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:13 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:54:15PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > Make sure these work handlers don't run after we
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:36:01PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:13 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:54:15PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Make sure these work handlers don't run after we system suspend or
> > > unload the driver. Note that we don't ca
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:13 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:54:15PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Make sure these work handlers don't run after we system suspend or
> > unload the driver. Note that we don't cancel the handlers during runtime
> > suspend. That could lead to a
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:54:15PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Make sure these work handlers don't run after we system suspend or
> unload the driver. Note that we don't cancel the handlers during runtime
> suspend. That could lead to a lockup, since we take a runtime PM ref
> from the handlers thems
Make sure these work handlers don't run after we system suspend or
unload the driver. Note that we don't cancel the handlers during runtime
suspend. That could lead to a lockup, since we take a runtime PM ref
from the handlers themselves. Fortunaltely canceling there is not needed
since the RPM ref