On 20/09/2017 10:56, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/09/2017 10:39, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we store the platform as a bitmask, and convert the
IS_PLATFORM macro to use it, we allow
On 20/09/2017 10:39, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we store the platform as a bitmask, and convert the
IS_PLATFORM macro to use it, we allow the compiler to
merge the IS_PLATFORM(a) ||
On 20/09/2017 10:27, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we store the platform as a bitmask, and convert the
IS_PLATFORM macro to use it, we allow the compiler to
merge the IS_PLATFORM(a) || IS_PLATFORM(b) || ... checks
into a single conditional.
Even
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> If we store the platform as a bitmask, and convert the
> IS_PLATFORM macro to use it, we allow the compiler to
> merge the IS_PLATFORM(a) || IS_PLATFORM(b) || ... checks
> into a
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we store the platform as a bitmask, and convert the
IS_PLATFORM macro to use it, we allow the compiler to
merge the IS_PLATFORM(a) || IS_PLATFORM(b) || ... checks
into a single conditional.
Even with the added BUG_ON this saves almost 1k of