On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:07:59AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/12/23 09:43, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:58:06AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> >> Now that framebuffer_check() verifies that the format is properly
> >> supported, there is no need to check it again
Hi,
On 1/12/23 09:43, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:58:06AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
Now that framebuffer_check() verifies that the format is properly
supported, there is no need to check it again on i915's inside
helpers.
Therefore, remove the redundant framebuffer format
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:58:06AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Now that framebuffer_check() verifies that the format is properly
> supported, there is no need to check it again on i915's inside
> helpers.
>
> Therefore, remove the redundant framebuffer format check from the
>
The Intel counterpart is also:
Reviewed-by: Simon Ser
Now that framebuffer_check() verifies that the format is properly
supported, there is no need to check it again on i915's inside
helpers.
Therefore, remove the redundant framebuffer format check from the
intel_framebuffer_init() function, letting framebuffer_check()
perform the framebuffer