On Wednesday 13 January 2016 08:34 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 18:20 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
When created originally intel_dp_check_link_status()
was supposed to handle only link training for short
pulse but has grown into handler for short pulse
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 18:20 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
> When created originally intel_dp_check_link_status()
> was supposed to handle only link training for short
> pulse but has grown into handler for short pulse itself.
> This patch cleans up this function by splitting it into
> two
When created originally intel_dp_check_link_status()
was supposed to handle only link training for short
pulse but has grown into handler for short pulse itself.
This patch cleans up this function by splitting it into
two halves. First intel_dp_short_pulse() is called,
which will be entry point
The link retraining part when EQ is not correct is
retained to intel_dp_check_link_status whereas other
operations are handled as part of intel_dp_short_pulse.
This change is required to avoid performing all DPCD
related operations on performing link retraining.
Signed-off-by: Sivakumar
Hi Shubhangi,
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next -- if it's inappropriate
base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shubhangi-Shrivastava/Fixing-sink-count-related-detection-over/20151102-205435
config:
The link retraining part when EQ is not correct is
retained to intel_dp_check_link_status whereas other
operations are handled as part of intel_dp_short_pulse.
This change is required to avoid performing all DPCD
related operations on performing link retraining.
Signed-off-by: Sivakumar
