Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: More surgically unbreak the modeset vs reset deadlock

2017-08-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 12:35:48PM -0700, Michel Thierry wrote: > Hi, > > First sorry about the delay... > > On 7/20/2017 10:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > There's no reason to entirely wedge the gpu, for the minimal deadlock > > bugfix we only need to unbreak/decouple the atomic commit from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: More surgically unbreak the modeset vs reset deadlock

2017-08-03 Thread Michel Thierry
Hi, First sorry about the delay... On 7/20/2017 10:57 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: There's no reason to entirely wedge the gpu, for the minimal deadlock bugfix we only need to unbreak/decouple the atomic commit from the gpu reset. The simplest way to fix that is by replacing the unconditional

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: More surgically unbreak the modeset vs reset deadlock

2017-07-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
There's no reason to entirely wedge the gpu, for the minimal deadlock bugfix we only need to unbreak/decouple the atomic commit from the gpu reset. The simplest way to fix that is by replacing the unconditional fence wait a the top of commit_tail by a wait which completes either when the fences

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: More surgically unbreak the modeset vs reset deadlock

2017-07-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
There's no reason to entirely wedge the gpu, for the minimal deadlock bugfix we only need to unbreak/decouple the atomic commit from the gpu reset. The simplest way to fix that is by replacing the unconditional fence wait a the top of commit_tail by a wait which completes either when the fences