On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:24:01PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
So summary:
- Reusing the dynamic gpio lookup stuff would be nice, and
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
So summary:
- Reusing the dynamic gpio lookup stuff would be nice, and might be
interesting as a new crazy use-case (or maybe not). But not a
On 03/25/2015 06:43 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:24:01PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
So summary:
- Reusing the
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:55:43PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
I quickly checked out your linux-gpio and it only has patch 2 to implement
the gpio. We also need patch 1 (but with the leak Thierry spotted fixed).
Should
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:35:32AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
The crystalcove pmic thing here really is just a dumb gpio line that for
the reference design gets routed to the panel (and hence has that as the
usual
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
The crystalcove pmic thing here really is just a dumb gpio line that for
the reference design gets routed to the panel (and hence has that as the
usual name).
So obviously the refman calls this register at offset 0x52
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:35:32AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
Some stuff may be needed to associate the regulator with the right
device indeed but nothing horribly complicated.
Nack, really. We've had an epic discussion
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:35:32AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
Some stuff may be needed to associate the regulator with the right
device
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:19:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Shobhit Kumar shobhit.ku...@intel.com
wrote:
The CRC (Crystal Cove) PMIC, controls the panel enable and disable
signals for BYT for dsi panels. This is indicated in the VBT fields. Use
that
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Shobhit Kumar shobhit.ku...@intel.com wrote:
The CRC (Crystal Cove) PMIC, controls the panel enable and disable
signals for BYT for dsi panels. This is indicated in the VBT fields. Use
that to initialize and use GPIO based control for these signals.
v2: Use
The CRC (Crystal Cove) PMIC, controls the panel enable and disable
signals for BYT for dsi panels. This is indicated in the VBT fields. Use
that to initialize and use GPIO based control for these signals.
v2: Use the newer gpiod interface(Alexandre)
v3: Remove the redundant checks and unused code
11 matches
Mail list logo
