On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:13 AM Lionel Landwerlin
wrote:
>
> On 22/08/2019 12:43, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2019-08-16 11:04:57)
> >> From: Lionel Landwerlin
> >>
> >> The way our hardware is designed doesn't seem to let us use the
> >> MI_RECORD_PERF_COUNT command
On 22/08/2019 12:43, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2019-08-16 11:04:57)
From: Lionel Landwerlin
The way our hardware is designed doesn't seem to let us use the
MI_RECORD_PERF_COUNT command without setting up a circular buffer.
In the case where the user didn't request OA
Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2019-08-16 11:04:57)
> From: Lionel Landwerlin
>
> The way our hardware is designed doesn't seem to let us use the
> MI_RECORD_PERF_COUNT command without setting up a circular buffer.
>
> In the case where the user didn't request OA reports to be available
> through the
I think this patch needs to be landed after
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/319815/?series=60916=10
As recommended by Joonas.
It should also bump the revision number of the perf API so that the
application can detect this feature is available.
Thanks,
-Lionel
On 16/08/2019 10:04,
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:04:57AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
From: Lionel Landwerlin
The way our hardware is designed doesn't seem to let us use the
MI_RECORD_PERF_COUNT command without setting up a circular buffer.
In the case where the
From: Lionel Landwerlin
The way our hardware is designed doesn't seem to let us use the
MI_RECORD_PERF_COUNT command without setting up a circular buffer.
In the case where the user didn't request OA reports to be available
through the i915 perf stream, we can set the OA buffer to the minimum
