On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:17:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular
> > mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we
> > let the modeset complete and then
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:23:39PM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 16:45 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular
> > mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we
> > let the modeset complete and then retry. We
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:17:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular
> > mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we
> > let the modeset complete and then
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Manasi Navare wrote:
> If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular
> mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we
> let the modeset complete and then retry. We save the link rate
> value at which link training failed and use
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 16:45 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular
> mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we
> let the modeset complete and then retry. We save the link rate
> value at which link training failed and use a lower link
If link training at a link rate optimal for a particular
mode fails during modeset's atomic commit phase, then we
let the modeset complete and then retry. We save the link rate
value at which link training failed and use a lower link rate
to prune the modes. It will redo the modeset on the current