On 2021-12-14 11:58:37 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:34:50 +0200
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > Looks lightly tedious. Can't we have "slow" (or whatever) versions of
> > the trace macros so we could just declare these the same was as before
> > without having to manually
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:34:50 +0200
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> Looks lightly tedious. Can't we have "slow" (or whatever) versions of
> the trace macros so we could just declare these the same was as before
> without having to manually write that wrapper for every event?
That would be quite tedious
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:36:52AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:03:00 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > Luca Abeni reported this:
> > | BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u8:2/15203/0x0003
> > | CPU: 1 PID: 15203 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted
On 2021-12-14 09:36:52 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Another way around this that I can see is if the data for the tracepoints
> can fit on the stack and add wrappers around the tracepoints. For example,
> looking at the first tracepoint in i915_trace.h:
…
Nice.
> We could modify this to be:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:03:00 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
>> Luca Abeni reported this:
>> | BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u8:2/15203/0x0003
>> | CPU: 1 PID: 15203 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.19.1-rt3 #10
>> | Call Trace:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:03:00 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Luca Abeni reported this:
> | BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u8:2/15203/0x0003
> | CPU: 1 PID: 15203 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.19.1-rt3 #10
> | Call Trace:
> | rt_spin_lock+0x3f/0x50
> |
Luca Abeni reported this:
| BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u8:2/15203/0x0003
| CPU: 1 PID: 15203 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.19.1-rt3 #10
| Call Trace:
| rt_spin_lock+0x3f/0x50
| gen6_read32+0x45/0x1d0 [i915]
| g4x_get_vblank_counter+0x36/0x40 [i915]
|
