Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/uc: Simplify firwmare path handling

2017-02-21 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:29:17PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > Typo in subject s/firwmare/firmware > > > > Currently fw->path values can represent one of three possible states: > > > > 1) NULL - device without the uC >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/uc: Simplify firwmare path handling

2017-02-17 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: Typo in subject s/firwmare/firmware > Currently fw->path values can represent one of three possible states: > > 1) NULL - device without the uC > 2) '\0' - device with the uC but have no firmware > 3) else - device with the uC

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/uc: Simplify firwmare path handling

2017-02-17 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
Currently fw->path values can represent one of three possible states: 1) NULL - device without the uC 2) '\0' - device with the uC but have no firmware 3) else - device with the uC and we have firmware Second case is used only to WARN at a later stage. We can WARN right away and merge cases